This article is within the scope of WikiProject Malta, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Malta on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MaltaWikipedia:WikiProject MaltaTemplate:WikiProject MaltaMalta
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Hi there! Ced malt, I see you removed the recipe collection, so I removed the "{{unencyclopedic}} material" tag. I'm leaving the tag regarding promotional tone for now, there's still a lot of phrasings that seem inappropriate for an encyclopedic article. See the manual of style for general article formatting advice; section headings use two equal-signs (like currently used in the 'see also' section). Headings should be used sparingly, the wording as minimalistic as possible, it shouldn't be tried to express too much with them. If you like to rewrite the headings, take a look at some of the other articles for some commonly used wordings and to see how the articles are structured. Or just wait until someone else edits them. The best way to achieve neutrality is when editors don't focus too much on improving one single article in one go, but stay around and watch what other people change, then further build upon that. There always can be found something to do elsewhere in the meanwhile. Editing is a slow process, especially in the lesser-known topics. 77.183.56.178 (talk) 16:11, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article seems biased, and not a little bit. I do not know the tag for "this article is obviously biased and someone who has some knowledge should even it out", but if I did it would be attached to the top of this page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.25.245.32 (talk) 09:02, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]